{"id":3598,"date":"2026-10-29T17:38:42","date_gmt":"2026-10-29T09:38:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/?p=3598"},"modified":"2026-10-29T17:38:42","modified_gmt":"2026-10-29T09:38:42","slug":"can-others-be-used-in-a-sentence-with-a-subordinating-conjunction-4658-202bba","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/29\/can-others-be-used-in-a-sentence-with-a-subordinating-conjunction-4658-202bba\/","title":{"rendered":"Can ‘others’ be used in a sentence with a subordinating conjunction?"},"content":{"rendered":"

If you\u2019ve ever typed a sentence that includes a word like \u201cothers\u201d and stopped to wonder if it can sit comfortably next to a subordinating conjunction, you\u2019re not alone. I\u2019ve spent the better part of a decade as a supplier focused on \u201cothers\u201d components\u2014parts that fill gaps in product lines, custom specifications that don\u2019t fit into off-the-shelf categories, and small, high-impact items that keep manufacturing lines running smoothly\u2014so I\u2019ve had way too many conversations over the years that veered from \u201cdo you have these 10 standard parts?\u201d to \u201cwait, can \u2018others\u2019 even be part of a complex sentence here?\u201d Others<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s start with the basics, because grammar rules don\u2019t exist just to frustrate people\u2014they exist to make communication clear, especially when you\u2019re talking about a niche product category like the \u201cothers\u201d lines I supply. Subordinating conjunctions are words like \u201cbecause,\u201d \u201cwhile,\u201d \u201csince,\u201d \u201calthough,\u201d \u201cwhen,\u201d and \u201cif.\u201d Their job is to link a dependent clause (a thought that can\u2019t stand alone, like \u201cwe don\u2019t have enough standard connectors\u201d) to an independent clause (a full thought, like \u201cwe need to source supplementary parts\u201d). The question is: does the word \u201cothers,\u201d whether it\u2019s a pronoun or an adjective, work in that dependent clause?<\/p>\n

The short answer is yes, but there are a few ways to do it right\u2014and a couple of common missteps that come up when people are writing about \u201cothers\u201d products, especially in technical or procurement contexts. I\u2019ll walk you through real examples I\u2019ve seen in supplier contracts, client emails, and even industry white papers, because that\u2019s where this question matters most.<\/p>\n

First, when \u201cothers\u201d is a pronoun\u2014meaning it stands in for a group of items that have already been mentioned\u2014it fits seamlessly into a clause headed by a subordinating conjunction. Let\u2019s use a scenario that\u2019s actually part of my day-to-day work. Suppose I\u2019m talking to a client who sources electronic components for medical devices. Their standard order is for resistors, capacitors, and diodes. But when they get to a part that\u2019s specialized for a pacemaker prototype, that\u2019s not in their standard list. So they might send me an email that says: \u201cAlthough we\u2019ve locked in our standard 10k\u03a9 resistor order, we need you to prioritize shipping others that meet the ISO 13485 quality standard.\u201d<\/p>\n

Wait a second\u2014does that work? Let\u2019s break it down. The subordinating conjunction here is \u201cAlthough.\u201d The dependent clause is \u201cAlthough we\u2019ve locked in our standard 10k\u03a9 resistor order.\u201d The independent clause is \u201cwe need you to prioritize shipping others that meet the ISO 13485 quality standard.\u201d The word \u201cothers\u201d here is a pronoun, standing in for \u201cspecialized electronic components that aren\u2019t standard resistors.\u201d Grammar-wise, that\u2019s totally correct. It makes sense, it\u2019s clear, and it\u2019s exactly the kind of sentence I get all the time from procurement teams. I\u2019ve responded to this exact type of note dozens of times, because it\u2019s concise and specific about what\u2019s needed beyond the standard line items.<\/p>\n

But here\u2019s where people sometimes stumble, especially when they\u2019re writing more formally\u2014like in a request for proposal (RFP) or a product specification. They\u2019ll try to use \u201cothers\u201d as an adjective in a subordinating clause, but they don\u2019t make it clear what \u201cothers\u201d refers to. For example, I once saw a draft RFP from a manufacturing firm that said: \u201cSince we need to review part specifications for all components, please submit datasheets for others by Friday.\u201d That feels incomplete, right? \u201cOthers\u201d here is trying to be an adjective, modifying a noun that\u2019s missing from the sentence\u2014readers are left wondering, others what? But that\u2019s not a flaw with \u201cothers\u201d or the subordinating conjunction \u201csince\u201d; it\u2019s a flaw with leaving a gap in the reference. Fix that by clarifying the noun: \u201cSince we need to review part specifications for all components, please submit datasheets for specialized others by Friday.\u201d Now it\u2019s clear that \u201cspecialized others\u201d refers to non-standard parts, and the sentence works perfectly.<\/p>\n

Another common scenario: when we categorize \u201cothers\u201d as a distinct line item in procurement. Let\u2019s say a client has a PO that lists Item 1: standard enclosures, Item 2: custom circuit boards, and Item 3: others. When they\u2019re updating that PO, they might write: \u201cIf the others line item exceeds $500 for this order, please notify our team before processing shipment.\u201d This is a sentence I\u2019ve seen in dozens of finalized POs. The subordinating conjunction \u201cIf\u201d leads the dependent clause \u201cIf the others line item exceeds $500 for this order,\u201d and the independent clause is \u201cplease notify our team before processing shipment.\u201d \u201cOthers\u201d here is a noun (shorthand for \u201cother line items that aren\u2019t Item 1 or Item 2\u201d), and it fits perfectly in that structure. I even had a client last month who used this exact sentence in a revised PO for a custom automation project\u2014no pushback from their finance team, no grammar issues, just clear communication.<\/p>\n

Now, let\u2019s talk about the one case where you might think \u201cothers\u201d doesn\u2019t work with a subordinating conjunction, but it\u2019s not the word or the conjunction that\u2019s the problem\u2014it\u2019s word order. English grammar allows subordinating conjunctions to come at the start of a sentence or in the middle, but when \u201cothers\u201d is part of that structure, you don\u2019t want to separate it from the noun it\u2019s referring to too awkwardly. For example, a sentence like \u201cOthers, because they have tighter tolerances, are the only parts that fit your assembly\u201d is correct, but a bit clunky. You\u2019d rephrase that to \u201cBecause they have tighter tolerances, others are the only parts that fit your assembly\u201d or \u201cOthers are the only parts that fit your assembly because they have tighter tolerances.\u201d That\u2019s not a rule against using \u201cothers\u201d with \u201cbecause\u201d\u2014it\u2019s a rule about sentence flow, which matters a lot when you\u2019re dealing with technical specs where clarity is non-negotiable.<\/p>\n

As someone who\u2019s in the \u201cothers\u201d supplier space, I can tell you that this isn\u2019t just a grammar trivia question. Clients get frustrated when communication is unclear, and misusing \u201cothers\u201d in a sentence with a subordinating conjunction is a surprisingly common source of confusion between buyers and suppliers. I\u2019ve had emails from clients where they wrote \u201cwhile we need others,\u201d and they meant \u201cwhile we need other parts,\u201d but left out the noun, so I almost sent the wrong size of component. Another time, a procurement manager wrote \u201csince others are available, we\u2019ll switch suppliers,\u201d and I initially thought they meant they were switching away from my company, until I realized they\u2019d cut out \u201cfrom your line\u201d at the end. That\u2019s the thing about \u201cothers\u201d: it\u2019s such a useful shorthand for extra, non-standard, or supplementary items that buyers and sellers use it all the time, but it\u2019s easy to forget that it needs to be anchored to a clear reference when paired with a conjunction like \u201csince\u201d or \u201cwhile.\u201d<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s circle back to real, working examples that come from my business. Last quarter, I worked with a medical device startup that needed parts for a new at-home testing kit. Their standard component supplier had a 6-week wait, but they needed a custom sensor that fell under the \u201cothers\u201d category on their PO. Their project lead emailed me: \u201cAlthough our initial order was for standard sensors, we can\u2019t wait 6 weeks, so we need you to prioritize the others that have the CE marking we require.\u201d That sentence is perfect. \u201cAlthough\u201d is the subordinating conjunction, \u201cwe need you to prioritize the others that have the CE marking we require\u201d is the independent clause, and \u201cothers\u201d clearly refers to the custom sensors they need. We fulfilled that order in 10 days, and they haven\u2019t had an issue since.<\/p>\n

Another example: a large appliance manufacturer I partner with updates their bill of materials (BOM) every quarter. They recently added a line for \u201cothers: utility-grade fasteners\u201d and sent me a note that said: \u201cWhen the others line item on our Q3 BOM totals more than 200 units, please use your pre-approved bulk pricing for metal fasteners.\u201d That\u2019s another flawless sentence. The subordinating conjunction is \u201cWhen,\u201d \u201cothers\u201d is clearly referring to the utility-grade fasteners in the \u201cothers\u201d line, and the entire sentence is a clear instruction for how to process the order. I input that instruction into our system without any questions, and the order came through exactly as they specified.<\/p>\n

So, to answer the original question definitively: yes, \u201cothers\u201d absolutely can be used in a sentence with a subordinating conjunction. The key is making sure \u201cothers\u201d is tied to a clear reference\u2014either a noun that\u2019s already been mentioned or a clear context that your audience (whether that\u2019s a grammar teacher, a procurement team, or a manufacturer) understands. The word \u201cothers\u201d is a workhorse in business, especially for suppliers that specialize in non-standard or supplementary parts, and pairing it with conjunctions like \u201cbecause,\u201d \u201cwhile,\u201d \u201cwhen,\u201d or \u201calthough\u201d is not just grammatically allowed\u2014it\u2019s often the most concise way to communicate critical needs.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re a buyer who\u2019s struggled to write clear orders for the parts that fall outside standard lines, or a supplier who\u2019s ever had to decode a confusing note that uses \u201cothers\u201d with a conjunction, I get it. That\u2019s why my team focuses on making the process simple: we work with you to define what \u201cothers\u201d means for your specific project, whether that\u2019s custom electronics, specialized hardware, or supplementary components, and we make sure every communication is clear, no grammar tricks or shorthand that leads to mistakes.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

If you have a project that needs \u201cothers\u201d components\u2014whether it\u2019s a small prototype run or a large manufacturing order\u2014feel free to reach out to discuss how we can support your needs. We\u2019re here to turn that confusing sentence about \u201cothers\u201d and subordinating conjunctions into a clear, actionable order that gets you the parts you need, when you need them.<\/p>\n

Pharmaceutical Intermediates<\/a> References<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.<\/li>\n
  2. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman.<\/li>\n
  3. Crystal, D. (2003). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.<\/li>\n
  4. Proceedings of the International Association of Business Communicators (2022). Clear Communication in Procurement: Grammar Best Practices for Supply Chain Teams.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
    \n

    Shanghai Arise New Material Co., Ltd.<\/a>
    We are one of the most experienced chemicals manufacturers and suppliers in China. With a professional production team, we offer a wide range of chemicals with superior quality and competitive price. Please feel free to buy bulk premium chemicals made in China here from our factory. Welcome to contact us for quotation.
    Address: Room A6, 421, 4th Floor, No.11, Lane 16299, Puwei Highway, Shanyang Town, Jinshan District, Shanghai
    E-mail: anna@arisenewmaterial.com
    WebSite:     https:\/\/www.arisenewmaterial.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    If you\u2019ve ever typed a sentence that includes a word like \u201cothers\u201d and stopped to wonder … Can ‘others’ be used in a sentence with a subordinating conjunction?<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":326,"featured_media":3598,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3561],"class_list":["post-3598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry","tag-others-4ed0-206814"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/326"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3598\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3598"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.zonesports7.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}